Asheville (N.C.) City Council Revises False Alarm Ordinance

ASHEVILLE, N.C. — The City Council here has taken action to reduce false alarms, including updates to fees and charges related to alarm systems that trigger an automatic response from the Asheville Police Department.

On June 22, the City Council approved new rules meant to tamp down on the problem, cutting off service to those regularly causing false alarms, increasing fees and requiring verification from companies.

According to a staff report, APD responded to more than 15,600 burglar alarms between January 2018 and May 2021, 97% of which were false alarms.

The council passed the new ordinances, replacing ones passed in 2002, unanimously with no comment as part of its consent agenda reserved for noncontroversial items, citizen-times.com reports.

During the meeting, Asheville Police Department Chief David Zack and the department’s administrative services manager, Dan Lemley, said the new rules were based on best practices found in other departments and would allow for “more efficient and effective policing through less time and resources spent on the response to false alarms.”

In one of the rule changes, alarm companies must now use Enhanced Call Verification (ECV), meaning they make at least two attempts to contact the alarm user to determine an alarm is valid before contacting police.

The two-call ECV system is shown to reduce false alarm responses by 40%, Zack and Lemley said. The system does not have to be used for fires, panic calls or cases where it is verified a crime is happening, such as with a robbery-in-progress alarm.

Alarm users in Asheville will also have to pay $25 permit fees and $10 renewal fees with $25 late fees after 30 days.

The new rules say it is illegal to use an alarm system to summon law enforcement when there is not a true emergency and that law enforcement and other emergency services can discontinue responses to the user if they violate any of the permit or other regulations, fail to pay fees or generate more than 10 false alarms in a year.

To reinstate service, users must appeal to the police chief, a process that now costs $50. If the chief decides to reinstate service, another $50 must be paid.

Civil fines that were part of the 2002 rules will continue with users paying $50 for three to five false alarms in a year, up to $500 for 10 or more.

The post Asheville (N.C.) City Council Revises False Alarm Ordinance appeared first on Security Sales & Integration.



from News – Security Sales & Integration https://www.securitysales.com/business/industry/asheville-false-alarm-ordinance/
via IFTTT

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Total Tech Summit Puts Call Out for Top Integrators to Apply Now

Image
FRAMINGHAM, Mass. — Total Tech Summit announces that applications are now being accepted to attend this year’s event. Comprised of the  SSI Summit, CE Pro Summit and Commercial Integrator Summit, this year’s event will take place in Las Vegas at the MGM Grand Hotel and Casino, Nov. 13-15. At this all-expense-paid, exclusive event, VIP guests will have the chance to sit in on industry-defining sessions, key boardroom presentations, and be able to meet one-on-one with potential vendors. Total Tech Summit brings together the best in class to share ideas, learn from others, and most importantly, accelerating the next stage of their businesses. It is the only event of its kind that bridges channels and connections by bringing together professional security, commercial AV and residential AV integrators. Another perk of the Total Tech Summit is the VIP Peer-to-Peer groups. These group conversations take place throughout the months leading up to the event and are guided by the editors of t
Read more

Top 10 Security Stories From October 2021: China Ban Gains Steam, Vivint Countersues ADT

October saw its fair share of legal issues and acquisitions. This month, lawsuits involved home security companies, a gunshot detection provider and even a media company. Vivint Smart Home is seeking retribution for the lawsuit ADT filed against it last year that alleged Vivint salespeople go to ADT customers’ homes, get them to sign Vivint contracts and install the company’s alarm systems in their homes under false pretenses. Vivint had requested a motion to have that lawsuit dismissed, but when the judge denied the motion, Vivint launched a countersuit claiming it is in fact ADT that is deceiving and stealing its customers. Gunshot detection provider ShotSpotter filed a lawsuit against media company Vice, alleging it is profiting off of fabricated claims. Vice has been critical about ShotSpotter’s technology in a multitude of articles. Though not a lawsuit, Dahua and Hikvision continue to feel pressure from the U.S. government as it considers a new measure that would make it imp
Read more

Minnesota AG Calls for Cancellation of Home Security Contracts for Alleged Fraud

STEARNS COUNTY, Minn. — Bring Me the News reports that Minnesota’s Attorney General, Keith Ellison, says he’s gotten consumers in Stearns County out of home security contracts after they were misled by a door-to-door salesman. According to the report, Ellison’s office announced that home security companies Skyline Security Management and Safe Home Security have agreed to their cancel contracts with customers in and around Stearns County who purchased their systems from door-to-door salesman Gary Harvey. “Door-to-door salesmen and their employers are in the business of trust-building,” Ellison said in a statement. “They know they need to have your trust to sell you their products, particularly expensive products like security systems that are supposed to keep your home safe. When that trust is betrayed, it’s emotionally and financially painful. I appreciate Skyline and Safe Home taking the right step in canceling these contracts while my office does what we can under the law to hold M
Read more